"Extremely Creepy, but Nothing Illegal": Charging Patterns During Pre-Arrest Screening

"Extremely Creepy, but Nothing Illegal": Charging Patterns During Pre-Arrest Screening
Belen Lorey-Kinberg, Rachel Bowman, Jon Gould
Publication Date
2022
Website
View publication details

We examine an approach to case screening where prosecutors screen requests for charges before a felony arrest is made. In 2016, Franklin County prosecutors declined to authorize arrests in 17.5% of felony cases. Declination rates, however, varied widely between offense types. Prosecutors most commonly did not authorize an arrest due to insufficient evidence, no crime having occurred, or follow-up needed. Among other findings, the cases of Black defendants, as compared to White defendants, were more likely to be declined due to insufficient evidence and additional follow-up needed. We conclude that prearrest screening by prosecutors can filter out weak cases early, increasing efficiency for the prosecutor’s office, saving the government money, and minimizing the impact of a “bad” arrest on a defendant.

 

Citation

Lowrey-Kinberg, B., Bowman, R., & Gould, J. (2022). “Extremely Creepy, but Nothing he did was Illegal”: Charging Patterns During Prearrest Screening. Criminal Justice Policy Review33(9), 918-942. doi: 10.1177/08874034221099604